Collaboration dog food

18 12 2007

I’ve yet to hear anyone, me included, say “my ____ [insert organization type here: company, non-profit, or team] communicates perfectly.” At every company I’ve worked for and with everyone I’ve spoken to, communication always seems broken. Your boss doesn’t communicate with you, the management team doesn’t communicate, or the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. While the company I work for can improve upon communication, I think we do it better than most.

I wrote a looooong blog post today about how we do collaboration. Since we sell software for doing distributed software development and collaboration, it seemed fit to put the spotlight on ourselves.

In theory, one would hope if we’re going to sell this stuff that we actually use it, too! :) For marketing, I’ve found the wiki to be invaluable in making it possible to communicate within the company and with contractors. A while ago, I wrote a post about using wikis for marketing, too. Here’s a link to the blog today on collaboration.





Part II: push vs pull marketing

15 12 2007

Hadn’t intend to write a sequel to this push v pull post, but a few very concrete tactical ideas were taking up space in my brain….

Making “pull” happen means putting few to zero resources in “push” things like a direct sales force, outbound emails, and telemarketing. In my previous post, I focused on high-level concepts, but more practically, here are some thoughts of where to spend your marketing dollars:

Creating a great website first, SEO second: Write useful, informative content your audience — be they customers, journalists, or consumers — wants to read without stuffing search engines with keywords. If you know the audience you’re writing for, the content of your site will get a decent ranking from the search engines. Then, you can optimize the site with the header tags, linking, alt tags, add your company’s name to the Yahoo! directory, work on your linking strategy, and all the other things that the SEO experts talk about.

Word of mouth and creating evangelists: Do you trust your friends’ recommendations or what some marketer tells you? Studies confirm that what you’re thinking: friends of course. Word of mouth is the most powerful way to market your products.Risk-free offers, trial evaluations, open or closed beta testing are ways to get people to try your stuff and, by extension, create some evangelists. There are ways, too, to systematically encourage word of mouth. For example, tell-a-friend programs. Working Assets gives their customers a free pint of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream for 12-months if their their friends signed up to use the phone carrier’s service.

Perhaps the simplest way to encourage word of mouth is by shocking your customers with a product or level of customer service that knocks their socks off.

Advertise: Start with Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and/or specialty engine ad networks and search ads first. They’re targeted. Experiment with other types of advertising such as banner ads.Scoble may say that newspapers are dead (and by extension, I assume he means print publications because they’re disappearing, consolidating, and crumbling too) but more pragmatic folks believe, and I agree, that print publications work perfectly well for some audiences. It’s just way more expensive than a lot of online marketing and it’s hard, if not downright impossible, to measure its impact. But the bottom line is that you have to go where your customers are, online or off.

PR: Hiring agencies is another surefire way of spending a lot of money. These days, it’s often equally effective to start a conversational marketing PR strategy. Talk with customers, bloggers, and influences in your space. And listen. Those conversations will turn up online and in print. It’s a slow process, but it ultimately turns into coverage for your company and products, and it doesn’t cost a dime. I think agencies are better suited to some industries than others, but you need to keep a close eye on your spending.

Conferences: Still one of the best ways to brand a company and get your name out, but they are expensive and very time consuming.

Channel marketing: Get someone else to push for you! :)





Analyst go the way of the media

27 10 2007

Why pay for an analyst’s stock research when there’s heaps of free information out there from experts in the form of blogs?

By way of example, here’s what I read to get marketing best practices ideas:

The list changes a bit every couple months as I get tired of one blogger and find another. This represents about 20% of the blogs I track, these are just the marketing-focused ones, but there also technology-focused sites like Techcrunch, ReadWriteWeb, and dozens of others crossing a variety of topics. I have about 100 coworkers reading blogs that interest them, too, and our company does a pretty good job to communicate internally about the most interesting news from these blogs (via internal blogs and the sharing of bookmarks). And then there’s our friends & family network, people who email us news and information out of the goodness of their hearts.

It’s a lot of reading to keep up with! Collectively as a company, I don’t think we miss any news… ever.

The news and analysis that we read is churned and turned into strategy. Regarding strategy development, we do most of it internally but we have recently penned an agreement to work with RedMonk, a firm that takes a different kind of approach to the whole analyst thing, for a short period of time. We’ll take that for a test ride to see how it works. We like the people behind the RedMonk brand, they’re bright, down-to-earth, and “with it.”

I don’t think we’re know-it-alls — we are far from perfect. It does, however, seem like a heckuvalot better approach than hiring traditional analysts or paying for their expensive opinions. Blogs and bloggers are having the same effect on analysts as they have with news media.

Not being sarcastic: Am I missing something? Is there some other reason to pay for a subscription to Gartner, Forrester or other firms these days? Do big companies still pay for them because it’s cheaper to pay an analyst then try to develop those critical skills in-house?